These results were derived from a demo environment. However, due to the limitations of a trial license provided by LoginVSI, we were maxed to a pool of 20 hosts. The scale of our desktop test pool could have been increased, giving us a very different result. We would like to state that the tests using LoginVSI could be optimized. This is what VDI is all about, increasing the amount of VDI sessions on your existing systems and still maintaining the same user experience with great performance. CPU percentage from the test, but the 13% difference in VSIbaseline average response time (ms) score shows us that Cylance has indeed a much lower profile (fewer resources used) on the VM than the traditional AVs. Unfortunately, we were unable to extract the avg. That will have less performance impact on the system. Cylance on the other hand, uses its revolutionary new features making a full system scan less essential. The difference can be mainly attributed to the fact that traditional AV immediately launched a preemptive scan of the filesystem. That is a big difference compared to the 19% of the other traditional AV. The results differ only by 6% from the baseline. This was the average score:īased on this research, we expect a positive future for Cylance. The baseline we achieved without any Anti-virus installed on the VMs was a VSIbaseline average response time score of 714.Īfterwards we installed CylancePROTECT, and we did more than 10 tests. This index simplifies comparisons and makes it possible to understand the true impact of configuration changes on hypervisor host or guest level. With Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) and Terminal Services (RDS) workloads, this is valid and useful information. VSImax is the ‘ Virtual Session Index (VSI)’. Cylance was run in the most restrictive setting, with all features enabledĪll results were given a VSIbaseline average response time (ms) score, that is based on the VSImax.We used the following setup on our 4-node Nutanix environment (total of 223.9 Ghz, 1TB DDR3).Īll tests where done using Login VSI 4.1.7.13 on a pool of 20 machines with a direct desktop connection: The difference between Cylance and traditional Anti-Virus is that Cylance uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to stop malware and other treats instead of the traditional pattern-based scanning, which is more CPU intensive. Therefore, we created a LoginVSI test environment on our Nutanix-based development lab in order to compare CylancePROTECT with traditional anti-virus. In the beginning, we had no available test environment in our lab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |